Le MAPAQ a perdu toute crédibilité

Si les inspectrices du MAPAQ n'ont aucune compassion pour un homme mourant les doutes sont grands qu'elles n'auront aucune compassion pour les animaux qu'elles sont censées protéger non plus.

L'histoire

Il y a quelques années, André Desjardins de St-Paul de la croix dans le Bas du Fleuve avait contacté les médias afin d'obtenir de la nourriture pour les chiens que le monde des alentours ne cessaient de lui domper.  Même que des fois les chiens arrivaient du bois et s'installaient chez lui.

Savez vous qui est descendu dans le Bas du Fleuve chez M. Desjardins ?

ANIMA-QUÉBEC et pas pour aider mais pour lui voler les chiens avec l'aide du Berger Blanc.

Parce que la présidente d'Anima Québec avait bien mentionné en pleine télé qu'AQ travaillait en collaboration avec le BB.

Ce fut un massacre. Les employés du BB ne savent pas capturer et manipuler des chiens. Comme la petite chienne personnelle de M. Desjardins ne voulait pas se laisser capturer, ils l'ont tuée entre deux véhicules. M. Desjardins a tout filmé avec son téléphone mais personne n'a voulu le voir. Pas même Denis Lévesque lorsque M. Desjardins est venu lui expliquer la situation. Il en riait. Comme un beau niaiseux.

Ils sont retournés une autre fois en 2011 et ont saisi les chiens qui appartenaient à sa petite fille tout simplement parce qu'ils étaient là, sur la terre. Comme dit M. Desjardins, y avait rien d'écrit sur le mandat. D'habitude, un mandat de saisie, c'est autorisé par un tizoune derrière un comptoir au palais de justice, pas par un vrai juge. Il ne fait aucune vérification sur la légalité du mandat.

Le suivi

La semaine dernière j'ai trouvé un article de TVA que d'autres chiens avaient été saisis chez M. Desjardins.


Après recherches et avoir parlé au journaliste, j'ai appris que M. Desjardins souffrait d'un cancer généralisé. Il est mort le mois passé.

Qu'à cela ne tienne, on continue d'harceler son épouse depuis 47 ans avec des histoires de chiens. Ils l'ont fait condamner à ne pas avoir plus de 15 chiens et en décembre les inspecteurs du MAPAQ ont appris qu'elle en avait plus alors ils sont descendus dans le bas du fleuve pour aller les chercher.

Mais la pire cruauté c'est qu'ils se sont aussi emparé de son vieux chien aveugle de 17 ans. Elle a plaidé pour qu'on le laisse mourir avec elle. C'était pas vendable qu'elle disait et elle l'avait depuis qu'il était chiot. Inutile. Ils sont partis avec. En plus de faire de la cruauté envers les animaux qu'ils sont censés protéger, le MAPAQ continue d'harceler et de briser la vie des humains qui en prenaient soin. Même s'ils sont en bon état. Tant mieux, ça se vend bien et la HSI va recouvrer ses débours.

Cas après cas, je ne m'explique pas le comportement de ces inspecteurs. A part le fait qu'ils veulent contrôler les humains en travers leurs animaux de compagnie, ils font totalement absence de GBS dans leurs actions et personne ne peut s'y retrouver pour éviter les coups bas à temps. Même pas moi qui suis pourtant assez intelligente, je ne les ai jamais vu venir dans la saisie du refuge.

Comme inspecteurs en cadavres (lire viande) ils n'ont aucune formation (qu'Est-ce que c'est que 3 jours de cours à apprendre à remplir des formulaires et se retrouver dans le P-42) sur le comportement des animaux de compagnie, le fonctionnement des refuges ou des sentiments humains envers les chiens qu'ils gardent à la maison. Ça leur importe peu d'ailleurs.

Évidemment, personne ne veut croire ces situations, même si le journaliste semblait assez sympathique à madame Thibault et à son malheur.

Que va-t-il falloir faire maintenant pour dénoncer ces fonctionnaires bien payés avec notre argent, avec l'argent des pauvres. Pourtant la charte dit bien que les biens de quelqu'un ne peuvent être saisis sans raison valable.

Le P-42 on l'avait demandé afin de réguler les usines à chiots. Malheureusement les inspecteurs s'en servent contre tous les autres propriétaires d'animaux excepté les usines à chiots. Comme quoi le système des enveloppes n'est pas encore tout à fait mort.

Si vous lisez l'anglais

C'est pas pour rien que la HSI accompagne le MAPAQ sur les saisies: c'est payant. Dans ce texte ça se passe peut-être aux USA mais la HSI vient de là et ses pratiques de vol d'animaux aussi. Il ne faut pas que ça s'implante ici. Aidez moi à trouver des solutions.

 

Rescue Raids: Confiscation Racket

Barbara J. Andrews, TheDogPress Editor-In-Chief |Oct 2012
 

Humane groups team with animal control to seize and sell valuable animals.  Legal advice and resources to prevent or deal with illegal seizure.

 

Note: The ASPCA (American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals), founded in 1866, has no affiliation with local groups.  Any rescue, humane society, or individual may become a non-profit "SPCA" which, as you are about to learn, can be extremely profitable.

 

Many who have had animals confiscated report that SPCA, HSUS, or local humane societies teamed up with Animal Control, which has police authority.  What follows are case files and examples of unjust seizures (available as PDFs) by those who misuse police powers to seize  healthy, happy animals. Defined by the FBI as Animal Enterprise Terrorism, animal seizures are highly profitable.

ABC News 20/20 spent a year investigating SPCA groups based on animal owners’ claims that SPCA falsely accused them of neglect, then confiscated their animals and sold them. In SPCA Steals Animals John Stossell says “"I thought they were heroic animal rescuers, but some animal owners say they act like petty tyrants, confiscating animals that aren't in trouble. The SPCAs are not police agencies, but they are given the authority to act like it. Animal owners tell us SPCAs abuse their power to steal people's animals.”

 

Rescue raids frequently involve horses or other livestock which sell for $thousands, thus impoundment is a lucrative business. Veterinary care is billed to the owner even if the animals are ultimately adopted or destroyed. It rarely does any good for animal owners to hire lawyers because local judges usually side with Animal Control. Most magistrates consider rescue groups as the experts who save abused animals, and through preconceived vision distorted by HSUS or Animal Control, they view plaintiffs as “hoarders” or “bad breeders.”

 

Whether any judges receive compensation for issuing warrants and handing out convictions for animal abuse is unknown.  According to the 20/20 broadcast, many victims had their lives destroyed by thugs who care more about fines and impoundment fees than about animals. Right or wrong, there may be no recourse because ABC News reports that many states have passed laws wherein “once a Justice of the Peace approves one of the SPCA's confiscations, an owner can't do anything about it.”

 

“Should we put Animal Rights above Human Rights?” Many great minds debate that question whereas groups such as PETA insist that a rat’s life has the same value as a child’s. There is no debate however, on whether many rescue groups profit handsomely from selling the animals they confiscate, aided by "humane interest" TV coverage generating generous donations based on dramatized plight of the rescued animals.

 

One attorney presents three cases of out-of-control Animal Control. In the first, an entire pack of valuable hunting hounds was seized, in the second, priceless pedigreed dogs were taken while the owner was at dog shows, and the third describes destruction of an internationally-known AKC judge’s career and reputation.

 

Working the system from every angle, rescuers typically invite television crews along on raids. Such broadcasts spur the public to adopt the animals (for a fee) or make generous donations-more than $6 million p/year to the Dallas SPCA-which, as revealed by ABC News, helped pay Garcia's $80,000 annual salary.

In one televised example, Animal Control raided a show breeder’s kennel. Reporters intoned “120 dogs lived in deplorable conditions.” The owner said some of them were thin because they were nursing large litters of puppies. Any dog breeder knows that to be true but the SPCA took custody of all the dogs “including award-winners worth up to $600 each.” The veterinarian stated that the owner “does care about and care for her animals, no starvation was evident” but a local judge upheld the confiscation. The dogs were sold even though the owner mortgaged her home for legal bills and consequently, lost everything.

 

Under current Federal Law, Title 9, Animal Law, sec 2.129, Confiscation and destruction of animals, an APHIS officer is empowered to:

• Confiscate animals which may then be "(1) Placed, by sale or donation, with (other) (2) persons or facilities … as determined by APHIS, even if (they) are not (APHIS) licensed or registered. Or the animals can be (3) Euthanized."
• The APHIS official (often associated with the HSUS or a self-declared local SPCA) can have: "local police or other law officer to accompany him to the premises."
• The really sweet deal is that the person, from whom the animals were confiscated, often without warrant, or proof of Just Cause, must: "bear all costs incurred in performing the placement or euthanasia activities authorized by this section."
• 
  

Animal Control/SPCA Confiscates 101 valuable birds in a particularly noxious raid. The owner, a licensed Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation rehabilitator, was at a Bird Fair when her friend arrived to care for the birds whereupon Animal Control promptly handcuffed and arrested her for animal cruelty! The cruelty was that during the SPCA raid, baby birds suffocated in overturned nest boxes, and the seized birds were made sick from unsuitable food fed by their "rescuers" and their respiratory systems were damaged by bleach spray; ignorant atrocities committed by the authorities. Upon testimony by a Board Certified Avian veterinarian and other expert witnesses, Pinellas County Judge Dorothy Vaccaro dismissed the case but nothing could undo the damage done to the birds and their criminally abused caretaker.

 

Bob Attelson, All Setters Rescue, was at a dog show when Little-Minded Littleton, CO executed the carefully planned rescue raid. They sealed off Attelson’s street with four police cars, two animal control trucks, six uniformed police officers and two animal control officers. Neighbors said it was like a terrorist attack. Actually, it was. Littleton SPCA and law enforcement battered down his door, terrorizing a mother dog, confiscating her nursing litter and three rescued dogs for which he was seeking homes.

 

In addition to confiscation and resale, plus court-decreed fines, fees, and impoundment costs, there’s another way to make money in animal rescue. Transporting adoptable dogs from shelter to shelter spawned a new industry under the acronym CUR, i.e. Canine Underground Railroad. Nel Liquorman, investigating for this publication, reported CUR’s unsavory connection with ALF (Animal Liberation Front).  Following a lead on “250,000 rescue groups” Liquorman discovered an average of 520 rescue groups for each state - 4 times the average number of counties per state! A startling statement on the profitability of rescue.

 

Small, cute, young dogs are highly adoptable and adoption fees are often higher than purebred dog  prices. Such dogs are transported to shelters with low inventory. According to Best Friends, some shelters publish a list of “to be destroyed animals” because rescuers are charged a “pull fee”.

 

If this seems like an Animal Control Nightmare, it is. Many breeders face police, SPCA, HSUS, rescue or local humane groups in defense of their house pets or livestock. In Denver, thousands of pit bull look-alikes were confiscated, dragged from the living rooms of hysterical dog owners and destroyed when the pit bull ban took effect in 2005. In Quartz Hill, CA a woman who depends on her trained service dogs fights LA's “no exemption” policy when against federal law, Animal Control tries to confiscate seizure alert dogs!

 

This well documented Illegal Animal Seizure Report reveals a nationwide increase in warrantless, illegal raids and offers sound advice on how to deal with profit motivated animal control. No one expects it will happen to them but it does, every day, even in small towns. If they confiscate your animal(s), even a rabbit, you face long-term boarding (impoundment) and veterinary fees which bankrupts many owners. If your animals are taken, your first call should to be to an attorney whom you have preselected.

 

Spurious dog bite statistics can incite a rash of raids against target breeds. When animal control stages a televised rescue, your face and your “helpless dogs” are flashed throughout the day, promoting the 6 P.M news of the confiscation that “saved a dozen animals” from animal cruelty and abuse.

 

The following legal advice is from George J. Eigenhauser Jr., a California attorney licensed since 1979, and someone who practices in the areas of civil litigation.  It is the best course of action to prevent arrest or compile evidentiary challenge if you are arrested. The first defense is to know and assert your rights, one of which is to forbid warrantless intrusion by not giving animal control, SPCA, HSUS or any “rescue” group a foot in the door, even if accompanied by a sheriff’s deputy or police officer!  This document is your best protection When Animal Control Comes Knocking at your door.

 

If you can't stop Animal Control from seizing your animals, you may have a winnable cause for action if you have good guidance and a record of court rulings. This Animal Impoundment Legal Defense offers a CD or USB drive packed with information to protect your rights if police authority runs rampant. You will be under emotional stress when challenging an attempt to remove your animals but be prepared and be careful because you could be arrested, ironically, for “obstruction of justice” or interfering with a law officer.

 

 

http://www.thedogpress.com/SideEffects/Rescue-Raids_LP.asp #1210131

 

Visit and bookmark the net's FIRST and most complete documentation of illegal seizures and impoundments, the Domestic Terrorist INDEX

 

Copyright © TheDogPress.com / Press Publications, LLC - All Rights Reserved Reprint Permissions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Disclaimer

 

Explore TheDogPlace.org for authoritative information on DogCare.